Nafisi’s story of Daisy Miller is vastly different from the
story I read and understood. When
I read Daisy Miller initially, the titular character came off as assertive,
entitled, and unrefined. However,
Nafisi describes Daisy Miller as some sort of heroine, noting how she was
“revolutionary” during her time period.
When one of Nafisi’s students, Mr. Ghomi, adamantly expresses his
disdain for a character like Daisy Miller, the female students privately went up
to Nafisi after class and expressed to her that they didn’t agree with
him. They had to go to Nafisi
privately because they live in a society where women cannot speak up for
themselves. Additionally, they tell
Nafisi that they appreciate her class as they are learning about female
characters they aspire to be. They
admire Daisy Miller for her courageousness about marching to the beat of her
own drum. So, when the students
found out that the story did not end with Daisy’s death, they were
puzzled. They didn’t understand
why they story had to continue on without her and with the male
Winterbourne. One of the students
actually pointed out that her death could have been a nice way to end the story
for all the parties involved. Mr.
Ghomi, however, found that she had to pay for her sins, implying that ending
the story with Daisy’s death would only glorify her.
My new understanding of the truth is that Daisy Miller can
be seen as a heroine. Although her
ways are unorthodox, she is still admired for standing on her own two
feet. This is important for Nafisi
and her students because they need to know that there are people like Daisy out
there in the world that are not afraid to speak their own mind. Learning about
another perspective of the Daisy Miller story tells me the dangers of a single
story. I found Daisy Miller to be
this spoiled rich wannabe initially.
However, after reading Nafisi’s story, I can see how she can also be
seen as a role model for those who don’t know or can’t stand up for
themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment